| Should threads with the intent of only showing a video clip be in their own category? | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Don't ask me WTF happened ot the formatting up there!
It threw an exception at first saying the question was too long (cos I had prefixed it "simple really," so I edited that out and got the above ![]()
[edit] and unless someone clicked at the exact same time I did, it's not recording results correctly either <sigh> Mr S, wanna delete and fix da poll please? [/endedit]
Jimbo : oÞ
"There's that word again... is there a problem with the Earth's gravitational pull in the future?"
This item was edited on Thursday, 2nd February 2012, 13:41
I was thinking about auto-prefixing threads with videos in them with [VIDEO], if that's any use. The trouble with a whole forum for them is a) all the people who only ever view the general forum will see even less traffic and think the site is dead, and b) often they are only of interest to certain forums.
Editor
DVD REVIEWER
MYREVIEWER.COM
My Flickr Photostream
This item was edited on Thursday, 2nd February 2012, 14:31
Well, you can either offer suggestions to make it busier, post more yourself, promote it on other forums/twitter/facebook, or if you get more pleasure out of being a nay sayer, carry on saying nay. ![]()
Editor
DVD REVIEWER
MYREVIEWER.COM
My Flickr Photostream
Quote:
alfie noakes says...
Where abouts are the doughnuts?Mr S will be hogging them during his video clip spamming presentations....
Jimbo : oÞ
"There's that word again... is there a problem with the Earth's gravitational pull in the future?"
Quote:
alfie noakes says...
Where abouts are the doughnuts?Look about you Alfie, describes a number of posters to a T.
Snaps
Every Third Car
--------------------------------------------------------------------![]()
I used to be with it, but then they changed what 'it' was.
Now, what I'm with isn't it, and what's 'it' seems weird and scary