Main Logo
News and Articles
  • Latest DVD News
  • Latest Blu-Ray News
  • Latest Columns
DVD Reviews
  • Latest DVD Reviews
  • Latest Blu-ray Reviews
  • Search for
Discussion Forums
  • All Forums
  • General
  • Television
  • DVDs & Films
  • Hardware
  • PCs & Mobiles
  • Photography
  • Music
  • Gaming and Consoles
  • MAD
  • Sports
  • Trading
  • Retailer Reviews
  • Bargain Buckets
  • Region Hacks
Your Account
  • Login
  • Create an Account
  • Lost Password
Region Hacks
  • Multi-Region Hacks
  • Hack Help Forum
Support This Site
  • Support This Site
  • About This Site
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Privacy Policy

DVDs & Films Forum - The Thing 2011 - Page 1

Google Plus One
Submit to Digg
Submit to Slashdot
Submit to StumbleUpon
Submit to Reddit
Tweet this Page
Share on Facebook

IMPORTANT - Click here to read the Forum Rules before you post!

Create New Thread
The Thing 2011
posted by Mark Oates on Wednesday, 30th November 2011, 23:58

Reviewer

Just seen Claudia Winklepicker and Who's he McNon-Entity talking this up on Film 2011.  Banging on about it being a remake of John Carpenter's seminal 1982 horror of the same name, and not once mentioning the Howard Hawks original of 1951 which wipes the floor with Carpenter's picture.  Have sent a strongly worded email (in the hope of being offered the presenting job for Film 2012). Winking 

J Mark Oates
--------------------
That's my story and like my underwear I'm sticking to it.
sprockethole.myreviewer.com

RE: The Thing 2011
posted by Rob Shepherd on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 00:10

Super Admin

Having seen both the original b&w and Carpenter's remake, theres no contest in my book, Carpenter's picture wins hands down!

Perfect pace, special effects that stand up still today, just brilliant!

Not that the original wasn't entertaining, but I know which one I've seen more than twice. Winking


Editor
DVD REVIEWER
MYREVIEWER.COM

My Flickr Photostream

RE: The Thing 2011
posted by MADTheOgster on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 09:20

Elite Donator

Another vote for the carpenter version, superb movie, tho the 2011 "prequel" is also very good, but it's a straight up monster movie rather a suspense/horror flick. Incredible special effects tho Happy

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Forever <M.A.D>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RE: The Thing 2011
posted by Gareth Williams on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 11:51

Elite

Two questions:

1. Why are you watching Film 2011?
2. Why do you expect any kind of critical integrity from Claudia Winkleman?

The show is just a series of promotional puff-pieces for whatever films are out that week. It ceased to be a film review show years ago.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

RE: The Thing 2011
posted by Snaps on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 14:50

Elite

Both previous versions stand up.
It's always difficult to compare an old B&W movie to a modern remake. You can never judge how well the earlier director would have made use of the more modern technology.
Purely on acting though I'd hate to have to split them.

Snaps

Every Third Car
--------------------------------------------------------------------


I used to be with it, but then they changed what 'it' was.
Now, what I'm with isn't it, and what's 'it' seems weird and scary

RE: The Thing 2011
posted by Chris Gould on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 16:29

Elite

The new one is a prequel not a remake. It's not actually a bad film (and there are numerous nods to the Carpenter flick), but ultimately it's fairly pointless. Structurally it's very similar to the Carpenter film, but with less tension, suspense, paranoia and, well you get the idea. Effects are decent enough, but not really any better than the 80s version, just slightly different as they are accomplished with CGI. Another ambiguous ending as well.

But yeah, Film 2011... I couldn't even sit through one episode. Utter bilge. It's more like one of those daytime magazine shows than a film review show. I never thought I'd miss Mr. Ross in anything, but even he was better than what we have now. It hasn't been worth watching since Barry Norman jumped ship to Sky. Someone should give Kermode a prime time review show - that's set the cat amongst the pigeons...





This item was edited on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 16:30

RE: The Thing 2011
posted by 1mills on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 17:41

Elite

I have not seen the "original" one from the 50's BUT


The new one is a prequel to the Carpenter as it is based on the Norwegian station aluded to in that one and the helicopter chasing the dog in the Carpenter "original", so think it's fair to refer it to that one.


I had heard very bad things about the new one, but it sounds like worth a watch based on the above comments? 

www.last.fm/user/1mills

RE: The Thing 2011
posted by MADTheOgster on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 18:14

Elite Donator

Quote:
Another ambiguous ending as well.


SPOILER:
Not really Winking  the ending shows the helicopter taking off to chase a dog, which leads directly onto the beginning of the carpentor flick (the copter pilot getting shot right at the beginning by Mr Bridges Snr)

I had heard very bad things about the new one, but it sounds like worth a watch based on the above comments?

i enjoyed it quite a lot Happy, but it's not as good as the carpenter "sequel ?" 




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Forever
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RE: The Thing 2011
posted by Chris Gould on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 18:36

Elite

I'm referencing an earlier scene. There is sequel potential if they so desire.





This item was edited on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 18:36

RE: The Thing 2011
posted by Snaps on Thursday, 1st December 2011, 20:54

Elite

Just checking IMDB for info on the original of which there is bu**er all.
Ridiculous that the only actor in it who has a publicity pic attached is The Thing itself (James Arness)

Snaps

Every Third Car
--------------------------------------------------------------------
*

I used to be with it, but then they changed what 'it' was.
Now, what I'm with isn't it, and what's 'it' seems weird and scary

<<< Return to threads
Choose a Page:
1
2

Some images and content © of their respective copyright holders, All Rights Reserved. All images and content © 1999-2012 Reviewer Ltd., All Rights Reserved. DVD Reviewer and its logo is a registered trademark of Reviewer Ltd.