DVDs & Films Forum - RE: Deathly Hallows I & IIAnticipation Thread - Page 8

Quote:
Hallsey says...

My only disapointement was the '19 years later' bit. I was kind of looking forward to that bit to get a sence of the future, however what we got was bloody awful wigs (especially Ginny's one). and no ones real attempt to make them look 19 years older. I am not one for liking the over use of CGI, but come on, something would have looked better than the 'quick lets see what we can find in the costume cupboard' look.Actually, what you got was a lot better than the alternative.

They originally shot the epilogue with the actors looking MUCH older, at least in their late 40s, when someone pointed out that they're only supposed to be 36/35. They had to reshoot 90% of the sequence at great expense. To be honest, I don't look that different now from when I ws 17. Shorter hair and little portlier, but I think they did a cracking job

============================


Writer's Release
My Collection