Main Logo
News and Articles
  • Latest DVD News
  • Latest Blu-Ray News
  • Latest Columns
DVD Reviews
  • Latest DVD Reviews
  • Latest Blu-ray Reviews
  • Search for
Discussion Forums
  • All Forums
  • General
  • Television
  • DVDs & Films
  • Hardware
  • PCs & Mobiles
  • Photography
  • Music
  • Gaming and Consoles
  • MAD
  • Sports
  • Trading
  • Retailer Reviews
  • Bargain Buckets
  • Region Hacks
Your Account
  • Login
  • Create an Account
  • Lost Password
Region Hacks
  • Multi-Region Hacks
  • Hack Help Forum
Support This Site
  • Support This Site
  • About This Site
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Privacy Policy

General Forum - Hardback v Kindle - Page 1

Google Plus One
Submit to Digg
Submit to Slashdot
Submit to StumbleUpon
Submit to Reddit
Tweet this Page
Share on Facebook

IMPORTANT - Click here to read the Forum Rules before you post!

Create New Thread
Hardback v Kindle
posted by Snaps on Saturday, 10th December 2011, 16:12

Elite

Just looked at the new Brian Cox book on Amazon

Hardback £10.20
Kindle £11.99

???

Snaps

Every Third Car
--------------------------------------------------------------------


I used to be with it, but then they changed what 'it' was.
Now, what I'm with isn't it, and what's 'it' seems weird and scary

RE: Hardback v Kindle
posted by Mikeonfreeserve on Saturday, 10th December 2011, 22:46

Elite

And you can sell the book on when you've finished



RE: Hardback v Kindle
posted by Miles on Saturday, 10th December 2011, 23:18

Elite Donator

Yeah, it's a bugbear of mine as well.

Note this bit: 


This price was set by the publisher

The publishers have it in their heads that they're devaluing their products if they price them too low, and they don't want to let Amazon dominate the ebook market so can choose the prices for different retailers. Which means Amazon usually has a higher price.

RE: Hardback v Kindle
posted by 1mills on Sunday, 11th December 2011, 00:35

Elite

In fairness even in the above example the ebook is cheaper.

It's the VAT that's the killer.

There is no VAT on paper books, but there is on ebooks as they electronic learning material or something 

The book listed in the first post is £9.99 excluding VAT (as that is all a publisher gets and is the actual selling point).

If the Kindle version was say £10 to us (so slightly cheaper), the excluding VAT point to the publisher would be £8.33 so they would take quite a hit on the prices, even though we would be kicking off about the only 20p cheaper!

Personally for £10.20 hardback I would expect to pay £6-7 for a Kindle version tops.  (Which would be £5-5.80 to the publisher.)



Government in robbing us blind shocker.


www.last.fm/user/1mills

RE: Hardback v Kindle
posted by Miles on Sunday, 11th December 2011, 05:05

Elite Donator

But Mills, think about the marginal cost of selling a hardback copy vs an equivalent ebook.
The costs of printing a book have to be fairly substantial, whereas the ebooks are generally just a file conversion of something they already have.

So yes the VAT makes a difference, but it doesn't explain it all away completely, for me anyway.

RE: Hardback v Kindle
posted by Mark Oates on Sunday, 11th December 2011, 06:09

Reviewer

But the conventional version of the book Snaps links to in the first post has an RRP of £20 (also set by the publisher). I'd expect unit costs on a print run of a book to actually be fairly low - only a couple of quid per unit. If Amazon buys stock from the publisher at a substantial discount for bulk (say £7.50 per unit) that means the publisher makes around about a fiver on each book. Normally a book shop would flog the book for the full RRP, pocketing the mark-up from its unit cost. Amazon not only has the clout to get a sizeable discount from the publisher, it also has the turnover to be able to keep its profit margin at a minimum to undercut rivals.

It can't, of course, bulk buy the Kindle edition because it's a digital file and they're only acting as an agent between publisher and purchaser. The Kindle edition doesn't require manufacturing costs, so the only money the publisher doesn't pocket is the VAT and the poor bloody writer's royalties.

J Mark Oates
--------------------
That's my story and like my underwear I'm sticking to it.
sprockethole.myreviewer.com

RE: Hardback v Kindle
posted by Snaps on Sunday, 11th December 2011, 11:17

Elite

As I'm not involved in publishing or book retail I have no idea how they arrive at the gross price but the net result is that Mr Cox wilbe staying on the shelf (or in bytes) until the price drops.

Snaps

Every Third Car
--------------------------------------------------------------------


I used to be with it, but then they changed what 'it' was.
Now, what I'm with isn't it, and what's 'it' seems weird and scary

RE: Hardback v Kindle
posted by Rob Shepherd on Sunday, 11th December 2011, 15:55

Super Admin

Alas this isn't that unsual. My dad got a Kindell and he says he rarely buys books for it for this exact reason, they aren't any cheaper than the print versions so there is very little benefit in doing it. Confused


Editor
DVD REVIEWER
MYREVIEWER.COM

My Flickr Photostream

RE: Hardback v Kindle
posted by fluff_n_stuff on Sunday, 11th December 2011, 15:59

Elite Donator

Another point to add to my anti-kindle campaign I believe Winking

RE: Hardback v Kindle
posted by Snaps on Sunday, 11th December 2011, 17:14

Elite

'Buying' is not the only option.
Particularly for older classics.

Snaps

Every Third Car
--------------------------------------------------------------------


I used to be with it, but then they changed what 'it' was.
Now, what I'm with isn't it, and what's 'it' seems weird and scary

<<< Return to threads
Choose a Page:
1
2
3
4

Some images and content © of their respective copyright holders, All Rights Reserved. All images and content © 1999-2012 Reviewer Ltd., All Rights Reserved. DVD Reviewer and its logo is a registered trademark of Reviewer Ltd.